Medicine and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Medicine and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

    

V NATIONAL CONGRESS SPANISH SOCIETY HEAD AND NECK (SECYC)

MADRID 2018
Early diagnosis and treatment of Oral Cavity Cancer

fibroma Osificante 1986 Rev. Iberoamer. Cirg. Oral and Maxilof., 8, 21 (61-68),1986

CLICK HERE

F. HERNANDEZ Altemir. And COLS.:
A CASE OF GIANT Cavum ANGIOFIBROMA INVOLVED
TECHNIQUE FOR TEMPORARY disarticulation pediculated A CHEEK maxilla,
ESTOMA VOLUME II 1982 I NUDE. I.
2- F. Hernandez Altemir:
TEMPORARY disarticulation pediculated A CHEEK maxilla (IS)
As an approach transfacial RETROMAXILARES MAINLY TO THE REGIONS AND OTHER INDICATIONS
VÏA MAXILOPTERIGOIDEA. A NEW TECHNIQUE .
ESTOMA VOLUME III 1983 ON ONE . I.

F. Hernandez Altemir, and Partners.

disarticulation temporal pedicle to cheek maxillary(is) as approach route transfacial
retromaxilares primarily to regions and for other indications
(Via maxilopterigoidea) a new technique.
Rev. Iberoamer. Cirug. Oral and Maxilof .., 5, 13 (81-102), 1983.

Access to the Skull Base – Maxillary Swing Procedure – 2018

CLICK HERE

 

1- F. Hernandez Altemir. And COLS.:
A CASE OF GIANT Cavum ANGIOFIBROMA INVOLVED
BY TEMPORARY TECHNICAL disarticulation pediculated A CHEEK maxilla,
ESTOMA VOLUME II 1982 I NUDE. I.
F. HERNANDEZ Altemir:
TEMPORARY disarticulation pediculated A CHEEK maxilla (IS)
As an approach transfacial RETROMAXILARES MAINLY TO THE REGIONS AND OTHER INDICATIONS
VIA MAXILOPTERIGOIDEA. A NEW TECHNIQUE .
ESTOMA VOLUME III 1983 ON ONE . I.

Prior Authorship

Abstract

This is a comment on a prior letter regarding authorship1 that appeared in the June 1994 issue of the Archives regarding an article by Catalano and Biller.2

The original English description of the extended maxillotomy procedure was by Hernandez-Altemir of Zaragoza, Spain.3 He had previously published this technique in a Spanish journal in 1982 and 1983.4,5 A scholarly review of all the world’s literature would have turned up this article by Hernandez-Altemir. Maybe then it would not have been reintroduced as a new procedure by three different studies.1,6,7

This episode brings to mind several problems that are becoming more apparent to readers of the otolaryngology literature. Some of it may be related to our increasing reliance on computer literature searches. If the key words used in searches do not match with similar articles, these articles will be omitted in the search results. I think this